In the days leading up to Election Day, a bold prediction echoed through political discussions: that Donald Trump would be declared the winner. I made this forecast four days before the election, despite initial inklings that Kamala Harris, with her prominent establishment endorsements and a visible connection to power brokers like former Vice President Dick Cheney, might be chosen. I believed that 2023’s Bohemian Grove gathering, an event associated with the Cheneyite high echelon of American power, had effectively "coronated" Harris. Yet, the unexpected happened—the symbolic torch was passed to Trump. So, the question naturally arises: why did the deep state allow him to ascend once more?
The answer, I believe, lies in a calculated move to pacify an acendant populist right, whose grievances had been boiling over. With Trump's larger-than-life charisma and penchant for theatrics, he became an ideal "sheepdog" to channel these sentiments and keep this acendant right docile. The American public, right or left, has reached a point where the status quo was no longer acceptable; the political establishment, represented by figures like Biden and Harris, had lost credibility. To allow Biden or Harris another term would risk pushing an already disenfranchised populace towards full-scale rebellion. Instead, Trump’s return serves to placate the grievances and frustrations of a right-wing and left-wing populist movement, preventing them from spilling over into uncontrollable territory, a territory where they actually unite beyond their left and right preferences. Populist vs establishment territory, not left vs right.
Democratic Incompetence or Intentional Sabotage?
The 2024 Democratic campaign led by Harris appeared almost meticulously designed to fail. When Harris brought Bill Clinton to Michigan—a state critical to securing a Democratic win—to speak to the disillusioned, it was as if her team had decided to go all-in on alienation rather than attraction. Clinton’s message to Michigan’s working-class voters offered little empathy and instead delivered a Zionist-leaning message in the wake of recent Middle East conflicts. His statement that Gazans shouldn’t expect compassion due to the events of October 7 only served to remind voters of Clinton's detachment from their concerns and fueled resentment rather than rallying support.
Biden himself then revived Hillary's "Deplorables Magic" with the garbage comment, resurrecting the disdain for working-class voters in language reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 approach. Such tactics—throwing inflammatory labels and reframing our neighbors as a target of scorn—didn’t just miss the mark. It painted the Democrats as out-of-touch elitists who didn’t just misunderstand the populist base but actively despised it. Harris’s inability to distinguish herself from Biden, even after his electoral unseating, further indicated a lack of any genuine strategy to win over the uncommitted. It all began to look less like incompetence and more like a play to throw the election—consciously or otherwise.
Trump and the Third Temple Agenda
For those who analyze politics through the lens of diabolical Zionist influence, the reinstatement of Trump may also signal the advancement of a specific agenda. Trump's role as an advocate for policies favorable to Israel, particularly in his prior term, aligns with the desires of Zionist-aligned factions within the American political framework. His declaration, before the election, that he gave Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a deadline to end hostilities with Gaza was a calculated move to paint himself as a "peacemaker," but given his track record, it’s unlikely that this deadline is as stringent as it sounds. I wouldn't be shocked by an extension.
For years, Trump has been seen as a figure with ties to Zionist interests, and his endorsement by certain powerful, pro-Israel groups has fostered a belief that he’s an ideal candidate to further agendas tied to the Third Temple movement and expansionist visions in the Middle East. In many ways, Trump's positions appeal not only to the Zionist factions but also to evangelical “Christians” who see his Middle Eastern policies as integral to their non-covenantal dispensationalist beliefs. With the Democrats increasingly losing their appeal to various minority groups like Arabs, Muslims, and Hispanics, and failing to offer coherent leadership, Trump's reinstatement becomes, from this perspective, almost inevitable.
The Deep State and the Illusion of Choice
My notion that the deep state maneuvers to retain control over American politics isn’t new. But the strategic installation of Trump as a "sheepdog" may be one of its most complex maneuvers yet. By reintegrating Trump into the political sphere, the establishment maintains the illusion of choice and freedom. The right-wing populace, feeling victorious, is unlikely to pursue extreme actions against the establishment because "their guy" is in power. Meanwhile, by propping up the Democrats as the unappealing “other side,” the deep state ensures that Trump’s populist rhetoric remains focused on surface-level grievances rather than pushing for substantial change in policy or structure.
Harris’s loss could ALSO be seen as a warning: the "deep state" will not permit leadership that fails to cater to Zionist-backed, military-industrial, or corporate interests, even meager claims of “working tirelssly for a ceasefire”, even that is too much for these Zealots. But by allowing Trump’s return, they can continue to pacify a dissenting populace under the guise of "winning" while subtly curtailing true populist power. Trump’s appeal is largely performative; he gives the right wing a figurehead but not necessarily the substantive policy changes they desire. And so, with Trump in the Oval Office, the American people receive spectacle, but the real mechanisms of power remain undisturbed.
The Future of Populist Movements
This calculated power play not only underscores the deep state’s adaptability but also hints at its endgame. By cyclically offering voters disillusionment followed by superficial victories, the political machine can perpetuate its dominance while fostering a populace that is simultaneously pacified and contained. For those truly desiring change, this cycle becomes both a challenge and a call to redefine political engagement beyond the constraints of the two-party system.
In 2024, as I cast my vote for Independent candidate Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, I did so with the recognition that America needs leaders who can cut through the theatrics and address real grievances. As Trump assumes his role yet again, the true question remains: will America’s right-wing base recognize the manipulation at play and push beyond the shepherds that guide them, or will they settle for spectacle over substance?
As we step into this new era of American politics, it’s crucial to remain vigilant. The deep state has proven it will go to any lengths to preserve its grip, even by bending to populist demands just enough to avoid the full rupture. The task now falls to independent thinkers, dissenters, and true populists to break this cycle and lay the groundwork for an America that answers not to hidden powers but to the will of its people.
Share this post