I've proven myself as a champion of independent, third-party politics. From chairing the Green Jesse Ventura/Cynthia McKinney 2020 presidential campaign, running for Arizona Governor as a Green in 2022, attempting to reform Arizona's corrupted governmental debate commission alongside former opponent Kari Lake, and working on the Independent Mayoral bid of Judge Joe Brown in Memphis and the Independent 2024 Presidential bid of E-Mail inventor Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, my track record shows that I’m determined to liberate the electoral system from Zionism and its stranglehold on the two-party duopoly.
Let’s address the obvious: I have come to condemn both the Greens and the Libertarians as intentionally ineffective. I no longer see either as a meaningful vehicle for change, they themselves will unabashedly portray themselves as ‘educational organizations’. My 2020 campaign for VenturaMcKinney is a testament to that. Because of my useless party loyalty, I could only secure one state nomination for our ticket—the Alaska Green Party—due to my misplaced faith in the Green Party’s national infrastructure. It was this misplaced loyalty that kept me from being ruthless in my pursuit of additional ballot lines. By the time I realized how futile my attachment to a "Green Identity" inspired by the late Petra Kelly was, it was too late. Howie Hawkins had already been coronated, and my chance to steal more ballot lines slipped away. The campaign peaked too late with Alaska’s defiance of the national party, and VenturaMcKinney, which I consider both my highest achievement and greatest failure, was essentially dead in the water before it really got started.
There’s a lesson in that: Never let loyalty to an ineffective political brand come before your larger goals. If I had been more aggressive, if I had cut ties with the Green Party sooner, we could’ve built something far more potent. But the truth is, despite having the Ventura name—a Fox News poll once had us at 15%—we couldn’t overcome the systemic roadblocks. My attachment to the Green Party hindered me from fully realizing my potential, and I’m not the only one who has suffered from misplaced loyalty.
Both Ventura and Donald Trump come from the third-party (Reform Party) tradition. The two nearly ran together on multiple occasions before being absorbed into opposing sides of the two-party system—though Jesse held out as an independent/third party person much longer. In 2000, Trump even borrowed from Jesse’s populist playbook while simultaneously critiquing Pat Buchanan’s bigotry toward Gays and Jews as a whole. Buchanan, of course, wrecked the Reform Party, preferring purity over pragmatism—just like the Groypers and many other factions today. The lesson here is that the far-right's obsession with identity and ideological purity often destroys any serious chance of gaining power.
This brings me to Nick Fuentes. My opinion of Nick is constantly evolving, and frankly, not for the better. While I don’t have the same level of animosity as others like Owen Benjamin or Ryan Dawson—both jealous of Nick’s popularity—there is some envy on my part too. I’ve got the experience; he’s got the following. The change I could affect with Nick's cult-like audience would be limitless. Yet here we are—intellectually honest dinosaurs like me fading into irrelevance while the frogs, led by Nick, dominate. But is that actually for the better?
Nick Fuentes, on several occasions, has rejected the idea of building a third-party vehicle, preferring instead to "infiltrate" the GOP and change it from within. Fine, that’s a strategy. But now, toward the end of this election cycle, he’s urging his followers—Catholics, anti-war advocates, immigration restrictionists, and MAGA loyalists—not to vote for Donald Trump and to stay home. In all my years in politics, never once have I advised people to stay home, regardless of the obstacles I’ve faced or the failings of candidates. Even if none of the listed names pass my personal litmus test, so much of our daily lives is impacted by down-ballot races.
What’s most baffling is Nick’s claim that "MAGA loyalists" should abandon their so-called "God Emperor." What exactly does Nick think a “loyalist” is? A free thinker? Nick is fundamentally confused about the nature of loyalty, and this speaks to a larger issue with the Groyper movement: it’s living in 2016, imagining Trump will "shock the world" again. Then, the fantasy collapses, and they reject Trump only to return to the same cycle again. Rinse, wash, repeat.
Yes, I do envy Nick—though not for his charisma or his political ‘acumen’—but for the potential his loyal following have failed to realize. That following could form the basis of a formidable third party, one that could challenge the Zionist duopoly. But instead, he keeps them locked in a pattern of online posturing, never realizing their full power. Staying home doesn’t build power. Maybe Nick is content with being an online figure rather than a serious political leader, but it’s a waste.
I’m an Orthodox Christian, and I don't recognize the Jesuit Pope as my sovereign, unlike Nick. The Jesuits are responsible for introducing the Futurism doctrine, which in turn gave rise to Dispensationalism—the same ideology that justified the Zionist state. At times, I’ve appreciated the takes of his fellow Catholics like Candace Owens and, to a lesser extent, Tucker Carlson. But I remain skeptical of any modern-day Papist, especially given the Church of Rome’s failure to make peace and end the West’s war machine that’s driven by Israel and its proxy, "Little Israel" (Ukraine).
In conclusion, Nick Fuentes’ "Stay At Home" campaign is more of the same: wasted potential. He could be leading his movement toward a legitimate third-party bid, something that could actually challenge the system. Instead, he’s telling them to disengage, ensuring they remain powerless pawns in a game that’s rigged against them. It’s not a path to victory—it’s a path to irrelevance.
